Offshore Nuclear Powerplants Esssay
Our writers will deliver plagiarism-free paper on this assignment. Order with us today!
Details:Background: Provide a description of the design, product, or
concept. Who is responsible for creating/producing/building it? What
need is it intended to fill? Who are the affected stakeholders, both
direct and indirect? What positive consequences are anticipated for:
The organization responsible for the developing the new
design/product? The intended users of the design/product? Others who
are not directly using the design/product but nevertheless might be
affected by it? You? What negative consequences are anticipated if
this innovation were widely deployed? What can be done to minimize or
mitigate any negative consequences? Position: Apply the ethical theory
(utilitarianism, RFP, or virtue ethics) you find most plausible to
this topic. Your application should be detailed (e.g. apply a specific
variant of utilitarianism such as pluralistic rule-utilitarianism) and
demonstrate an understanding of the mechanics of the approach. You may
also apply your discipline’s code of ethics in detail. This means you
will need to explain how key concepts such as \’safety\’ or
\’welfare\’ should be interpreted in your application. Make sure you
clearly explain and defend your application. Should the deployment of
this design/product continue? Explain and justify your answer.
Anticipate and respond to 1-2 of the strongest, most plausible
objections to your position.
Here’s a snippet of the essay.
Nuclear power has remained controversial for numerous reasons, mainly due to the risks it poses and the fact that people do not want to live next to these stations for fear of a Chernobyl kind of a disaster. Researchers have come up with new a design regarding how future nuclear power plants should look like in order to avoid trauma that led to the Fukushima disaster in 2011: by building nuclear power plants eight to twenty- two kilometers out in the ocean. According to researchers at MIT, this distance eliminates the risks associated with tsunamis since in such deep waters the size of the waves will be smaller (Chandler 1). Additionally, risks brought about by earthquakes will also be reduced because the ocean tends to absorb and weaken seismic waves.
This plan also provides a more critical benefit, the ability to prevent and avoid meltdowns by utilizing the water in the ocean as a coolant. The water in the ocean can serve as a heat sink, the heat generated from the decay and by the nuclear reactant even when the plant is not operational, can be removed for good or indefinitely. According to the new plans, nuclear power plants would be designed to float on platforms identical to those used for offshore drilling of oil and they would be built in such a way that they are automatically cooled by ocean water in case the reactor’s system is unable to keep the plant deep underwater (Chandler 1). The above mentioned advantages would allow nuclear power plants to evade and prevent a disaster similar to that of Fukushima that occurred due it being hit by an earthquake leading to meltdown. Researchers in MIT believe that this new design is fit for plants of various sizes and that it is a more logical location because nuclear power plants are in many cases located near large water bodies. Additionally, offshore nuclear power plants are movable and transportable, this important trait could result in reduced constructions periods and enhanced fabrication quality (Kaku 59). In summary, these nuclear power plants will avail a mechanism for producing power safely and continuously by moving conventional power plants from the land and transferring them into the ocean (World Nuclear News 1).